<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lachman Sures Dollhouse Foundations Before Sweeps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.endofshow.com/2009/10/22/lachman-sures-dollhouse-foundations-before-sweeps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.endofshow.com/2009/10/22/lachman-sures-dollhouse-foundations-before-sweeps/</link>
	<description>Television with its insides turned out</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry</title>
		<link>http://www.endofshow.com/2009/10/22/lachman-sures-dollhouse-foundations-before-sweeps/comment-page-1/#comment-2832</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endofshow.com/?p=589#comment-2832</guid>
		<description>.... Oh, and one more thing.....

So often we see actors with only the flexibility to perform slightly modified versions of themselves. 

But Dollhouse required the best; that ability to completely transform into any chosen character, losing any trace of one&#039;s own personality. 

And Dollhouse delivered. 

We got great ranges of performance in that respect, but especially from Dichen Lachman who convincingly played such a wide range of characters, from a hard-eyed gun-girl to a nerdy fan, with many shades in between. 

Dollhouse has sweeping imagination, great scripts and fine acting. So, come on Fox, what else are you looking for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;. Oh, and one more thing&#8230;..</p>
<p>So often we see actors with only the flexibility to perform slightly modified versions of themselves. </p>
<p>But Dollhouse required the best; that ability to completely transform into any chosen character, losing any trace of one&#8217;s own personality. </p>
<p>And Dollhouse delivered. </p>
<p>We got great ranges of performance in that respect, but especially from Dichen Lachman who convincingly played such a wide range of characters, from a hard-eyed gun-girl to a nerdy fan, with many shades in between. </p>
<p>Dollhouse has sweeping imagination, great scripts and fine acting. So, come on Fox, what else are you looking for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry</title>
		<link>http://www.endofshow.com/2009/10/22/lachman-sures-dollhouse-foundations-before-sweeps/comment-page-1/#comment-2830</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endofshow.com/?p=589#comment-2830</guid>
		<description>I have viewed the whole first series on DVD and would have done so in one go if it wasn&#039;t for the need to sleep. 

Trust Josh Whedon not to use the notion of a Dollhouse simply as a base from which to launch conventional plots. 

Rather, the Dollhouse is a concept with profound implications and extraordinary consequences, not least for the Dollhouse itself. Whedon didn&#039;t fail to realise them and explore them. This is sci-fi at its classical best, and that&#039;s what impressed me.

I have read others saying the series made an average start (6/10, OK for the loyal fan base etc.) There is always room for improvement to any idea, but given the imaginative sweep of the Dollhouse concept, I can&#039;t see how it could have been bettered for a first go.

Now that the first series is over, it&#039;s easy to appreciate how wild the possibilities might be for its continuation, an &quot;embarrassment of riches&quot; in fact. 

In other hands, it would be difficult to keep a second series on the rails but I am sure Josh Whedon measures up to the task.  Bring it on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have viewed the whole first series on DVD and would have done so in one go if it wasn&#8217;t for the need to sleep. </p>
<p>Trust Josh Whedon not to use the notion of a Dollhouse simply as a base from which to launch conventional plots. </p>
<p>Rather, the Dollhouse is a concept with profound implications and extraordinary consequences, not least for the Dollhouse itself. Whedon didn&#8217;t fail to realise them and explore them. This is sci-fi at its classical best, and that&#8217;s what impressed me.</p>
<p>I have read others saying the series made an average start (6/10, OK for the loyal fan base etc.) There is always room for improvement to any idea, but given the imaginative sweep of the Dollhouse concept, I can&#8217;t see how it could have been bettered for a first go.</p>
<p>Now that the first series is over, it&#8217;s easy to appreciate how wild the possibilities might be for its continuation, an &#8220;embarrassment of riches&#8221; in fact. </p>
<p>In other hands, it would be difficult to keep a second series on the rails but I am sure Josh Whedon measures up to the task.  Bring it on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.endofshow.com/2009/10/22/lachman-sures-dollhouse-foundations-before-sweeps/comment-page-1/#comment-2829</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endofshow.com/?p=589#comment-2829</guid>
		<description>I think that this episode obviously shows that the show concept is good. However it does appear that perhaps the initial scripts were vetted by people who may have steered the show in the wrong direction. When you think about it - such a show format could have amazing results as every episode could be as good and as original as it gets. How sad that it has take up till not to show how good it could be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this episode obviously shows that the show concept is good. However it does appear that perhaps the initial scripts were vetted by people who may have steered the show in the wrong direction. When you think about it &#8211; such a show format could have amazing results as every episode could be as good and as original as it gets. How sad that it has take up till not to show how good it could be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention END OF SHOW – Inside television news » Lachman Sures Dollhouse Foundations Before Sweeps -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.endofshow.com/2009/10/22/lachman-sures-dollhouse-foundations-before-sweeps/comment-page-1/#comment-2820</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention END OF SHOW – Inside television news » Lachman Sures Dollhouse Foundations Before Sweeps -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endofshow.com/?p=589#comment-2820</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Endof Show, Syd Harewood. Syd Harewood said: Lachman Sures Dollhouse Foundations Before Sweeps http://bit.ly/3Do5AC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Endof Show, Syd Harewood. Syd Harewood said: Lachman Sures Dollhouse Foundations Before Sweeps <a href="http://bit.ly/3Do5AC" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3Do5AC</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
